Reproducible western blot for quantitative research
Run a full dose-response or time course on a single gel, with every replicate and control under identical conditions. Reproducibility built into the format, not fought for after the fact.
A tank, not a new platform to defend.
Doses, timepoints, and replicates together.
Ready to cite in a methods section.
Across the whole experiment.
A dose-response matrix or a time course needs more conditions than a standard gel can hold. Splitting it across five to seven gels means normalizing across all of them, and every one of those normalizations adds noise.
Reviewers and funders have gotten stricter about replication and normalization, and cross-gel variability is one of the first things flagged. The usual responses are to run more replicates, which multiplies the gels, or to defend the normalization approach in the methods section.
G96 holds up to 96 samples, so the entire condition set runs on one gel with one normalization. The variable is removed instead of corrected for.
A standard western blot from start to finish. The gel holds more conditions; nothing else about the process changes.
Load up to 96 conditions, replicates, and controls at up to 30 microliters per well, using existing sample prep and Laemmli buffer.
Run in the HT-1 horizontal tank on a standard power supply, then wet transfer to nitrocellulose or PVDF. Every condition sees the same run and transfer.
Probe with the antibodies already validated in your lab, image on your existing system, and normalize once across the full experiment.
| G96 | Standard 15-well gel workflow | 96-well precast alternative | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gels for a 72 to 96 condition set | 1 | 5 to 7 | 1 |
| Normalization rounds | 1, all conditions on one gel | 5 to 7 separate normalizations | 1, but fixed gel percentage limits separation |
| Cross-gel variability | Removed at the source | A known rigor concern | Removed at the gel level |
| Buffers | Lab's existing | Lab's existing | Proprietary loading buffer plus a priming step |
| Antibodies | Already validated in the lab | Already validated in the lab | Already validated in the lab |
The format is backed by NIH-funded, peer-reviewed work. If a reviewer questions the method, that citation is the answer, and it belongs in the methods section alongside the antibodies.
Serial dilutions of recombinant alpha tubulin were run on a traditional western blot gel and a G96 gel, transferred to the same membrane type, incubated with the same antibodies, and detected with the same chemiluminescent substrate, showing equivalent sensitivity.
The founders hit the same throughput and normalization wall in their own NIH-funded research and engineered the fix.
A loaner evaluation lets you run one experiment on your own samples before you commit further.
The antibody sensitivity and detection chemistry are the same as a standard western blot. What changes is the number of gels and the number of normalizations, not the underlying biology or the detection method.
Yes. Standard antibodies and protocols, with no proprietary reagents required.
The format is supported by a peer-reviewed publication and NIH funding, which is the citation to give if a reviewer asks.
The format itself is backed by peer-reviewed, NIH-funded work, and that is the citable evidence today. A loaner evaluation lets you generate a pilot dataset on your own samples before you commit further.
The HT-1 tank and the gels. Your antibodies, buffers, transfer setup, and imaging system stay the same.
Run one experiment you would otherwise split across six gels and compare the normalization for yourself.